William Bug
Impact in
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
-
- Scientific Computing and Data Management
Papers in
-
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 6
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 2
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research 1
-
- Semantic Web and Ontologies 4
- Co-authors
- Alan Ruttenberg (2 shared papers)Neocles B. Leontis (1 shared paper)Amelia Ireland (1 shared paper)Chris Mungall (1 shared paper)Nigam H. Shah (1 shared paper)Cornelius Rosse (1 shared paper)Richard H. Scheuermann (1 shared paper)Barry Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neuroinformatics (4 papers)BMC Bioinformatics (1 paper)Journal of Neurochemistry (1 paper)Nature Biotechnology (1 paper)Methods in molecular biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
William Bug
11 papers receiving 1.7k citations
William Bug's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Artificial Intelligence 983
- Information Systems and Management 185
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Health Information Management 68
- Biophysics 64
Countries citing papers authored by William Bug
This map shows the geographic impact of William Bug's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bug with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bug more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Bug
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bug. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bug. The network helps show where William Bug may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Bug, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1564 |
| 2 | 2008 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 4 | The OWL of Biomedical Investigations. | 2008 | 18 |
| 5 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 7 | |
| 8 | An Ontology-Driven Knowledge Environment For Subcellular Neuroanatomy. | 2007 | 6 |
| 9 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 1 |
About William Bug
William Bug is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (3 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (1 paper) and Cell Image Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (983 citations), Information Systems and Management (185 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Health Information Management (68 citations) and Biophysics (64 citations). William Bug has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alan Ruttenberg, Neocles B. Leontis, Amelia Ireland, Chris Mungall, Nigam H. Shah, Cornelius Rosse, Richard H. Scheuermann, Barry Smith, Philippe Rocca‐Serra and Louis J. Goldberg. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroinformatics, BMC Bioinformatics, Journal of Neurochemistry, Nature Biotechnology and Methods in molecular biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.