William Block

5.8k citations
132 papers · 5k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

William Block

131 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

William Block
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Ecology 3.7k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 277
  • Insect Science 268
  • Atmospheric Science 337
Replace MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND with:
MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND United Kingdom
Hans Petter Leinaas Norway
Dorota L. Porazinska United States
Nicholas L. Rodenhouse United States
Ian D. Hogg New Zealand
Alan Buse United Kingdom
Seppo Neuvonen Finland
Mark I. Stevens Australia
Mauro Gobbi Italy
Teuvo Ahtı Finland
William Block relative to MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND United Kingdom MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Block. The network helps show where William Block may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Block, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Block Line = papers co-authored together William Block links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 132 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988236
2 1990228
3 1987126
4 1982125
5 1998122
6 1980112
7 1996112
8 1995110
9
Terrestrial microbiology, invertebrates and ecosystems.
1984106
10 1992103
11 200397
12 199390
13 199683
14 200983
15 198282
16 198278
17 199574
18 197868
19 198067
20 198466

About William Block

William Block is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atmospheric Science, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 132 papers that have together received 5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physiological and biochemical adaptations (78 papers), Polar Research and Ecology (53 papers), Study of Mite Species (15 papers), Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (13 papers), Climate change and permafrost (9 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers) and nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (3.7k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (277 citations), Insect Science (268 citations) and Atmospheric Science (337 citations). William Block has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include MICHAEL ROGER WORLAND, Lauritz Sømme, Peter Convey, I. D. Hodkinson, Neil Webb, R. J. C. Cannon, J. S. Bale, Stephen R. Young, Stephen J. Coulson and A. T. Strathdee. Their work appears in journals such as Polar Biology, Oikos, Journal of Insect Physiology, Cryobiology and Cryoletters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact