William Bishop

69 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

William Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Archeology 19
  • Law 99
  • Paleontology 66
  • Hardware and Architecture 57
  • Anthropology 69
Replace M.J. Baxter with:
M.J. Baxter United Kingdom
Graeme Earl United Kingdom
R. R. Laxton United Kingdom
C. D. Litton United Kingdom
David Novák Czechia
Clifford T. Brown United States
Werner Rom Austria
M. J. Baxter United Kingdom
Mark Lake United Kingdom
Michael Metcalf Switzerland
William Bishop relative to M.J. Baxter United Kingdom M.J. Baxter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
M.J. Baxter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Bishop. The network helps show where William Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Bishop Line = papers co-authored together William Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1965170
2 200760
3 200733
4 198228
5 200526
6 199023
7 196522
8 198521
9 198318
10
Contract: Cases and Materials
198716
11 197816
12 198415
13 201614
14 198912
15 198610
16 201410
17 201310
18 19699
19
Efficient Multi-Modal Least-Squares Alignment of Medical Images Using Quasi-Orientation Maps.
20068
20 20078

About William Bishop

William Bishop is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Law, Economics and Econometrics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 75 papers that have together received 656 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (12 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (11 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (9 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (6 papers), Satellite Communication Systems (6 papers), Power Line Communications and Noise (6 papers), UAV Applications and Optimization (5 papers) and European and International Contract Law (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (19 citations), Law (99 citations), Paleontology (66 citations), Hardware and Architecture (57 citations) and Anthropology (69 citations). William Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Kennings, Alexander Wong, Robert J. Kerczewski, Jeffrey D. Wilson, F. Clark Howell, H. E. Wright, Miklós Kretzoi, Jack F. Evernden, Garniss H. Curtis and Richard L. Hay. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Legal Studies, Modern Law Review, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis and Pattern Recognition Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact