Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

1.2k papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies usually cover Law (787 papers), Political Science and International Relations (395 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (229 papers) specifically the topics of Legal principles and applications (423 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (246 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies are John Rawls, Anthony Ogus, Christopher McCrudden, Robert E. Goodin, Andrea Sangiovanni, Paul H. Robinson, Gustav Radbruch, Lucia Zedner, Joseph Raz and Hugh Collins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Journal of Legal Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025