Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Legal Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Legal Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Legal Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies.
About The Journal of Legal Studies
The 1.1k papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies in the last decades have received a total of 44.9k indexed citations . Papers published in The Journal of Legal Studies usually cover Law (377 papers), Economics and Econometrics (792 papers), General Decision Sciences (30 papers), Pharmacy (62 papers) and Accounting (100 papers) specifically the topics of Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (612 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (290 papers), Legal principles and applications (152 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (122 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (72 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (62 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (51 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Legal Studies are Richard A. Posner, Steven Shavell, William M. Landes, George J. Stigler, George L. Priest, Uri Gneezy, Gary S. Becker, Aldo Rustichini, Paul H. Rubin and Kenneth W. Dam.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.