William Barnes
Impact in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction 2
-
- Sustainable Supply Chain Management 1
- Co-authors
- Myles Gartland (1 shared paper)Martin Stack (1 shared paper)Wolf Singer (2 shared papers)Alina Peter (2 shared papers)Martin Vinck (2 shared papers)Rasmus Roese (2 shared papers)Johanna Klon-Lipok (2 shared papers)Cem Uran (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (3 papers)Journal of Economic Issues (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)eLife (1 paper)Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
William Barnes
12 papers receiving 275 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
- Behavioral Neuroscience 13
- Information Systems and Management 22
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 51
- Reproductive Medicine 20
Countries citing papers authored by William Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of William Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Barnes. The network helps show where William Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside William Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 165 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 5 | Managerial catalyst : the story of London Business School 1964 to 1989 | 1989 | 7 |
| 6 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 0 |
About William Barnes
William Barnes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Marketing and Accounting, having authored 14 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (1 paper), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (13 citations), Information Systems and Management (22 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (51 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (20 citations). William Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Myles Gartland, Martin Stack, Wolf Singer, Alina Peter, Martin Vinck, Rasmus Roese, Johanna Klon-Lipok, Cem Uran, Pascal Fries and Mary S. Erskine. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of Economic Issues, Neuron, eLife and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.