William Barnes

464 citations
14 papers · 283 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

William Barnes

11 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

William Barnes
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 83
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Information Systems and Management 23
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 50
  • Marketing 24
Replace Catherine Tucker with:
Catherine Tucker United States
Mohsin Raza Thailand
Vittorio Pelligra Italy
Inga Ulnicane United Kingdom
Dale Young United States
Cary Frydman United States
Melanie Kan Australia
Judith Kenner Thompson United States
Robin Chark Macao
William Barnes relative to Catherine Tucker United States Catherine Tucker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Catherine Tucker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Barnes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Barnes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Barnes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Barnes. The network helps show where William Barnes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside William Barnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Barnes Line = papers co-authored together William Barnes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2004153
2 201951
3 200132
4 202225
5
Managerial catalyst : the story of London Business School 1964 to 1989
19896
6 20114
7 20123
8 20103
9 20103
10 20182
11 20231
12 19800
13 20110
14 20100

About William Barnes

William Barnes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions, Marketing and Accounting, having authored 14 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (1 paper), Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations), Information Systems and Management (23 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (50 citations) and Marketing (24 citations). William Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Martin Stack, Myles Gartland, Alina Peter, Pascal Fries, Cem Uran, Johanna Klon-Lipok, Martin Vinck, Wolf Singer, Mary S. Erskine and Eva K. Polston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Journal of Economic Issues, Journal of Neuroscience, eLife and Neuron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact