William Barbour

30 papers receiving 305 citations

Peers

William Barbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Transportation 85
  • Building and Construction 145
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 90
  • Automotive Engineering 101
  • Control and Systems Engineering 75
Replace Jiateng Yin with:
Jiateng Yin China
Lu Tong China
Gongyuan Lu China
Zhiyuan Lin United Kingdom
Abbas Babazadeh Iran
Markus Friedrich Germany
Nicolas Lefèbvre Norway
Nadir Farhi France
Mario Binetti Italy
Mohamed Kaseko United States
William Barbour relative to Jiateng Yin China Jiateng Yin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Jiateng Yin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Barbour. The network helps show where William Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Barbour Line = papers co-authored together William Barbour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201891
2 202338
3 202222
4 201820
5 202119
6 202419
7 202017
8 202412
9 20209
10 20238
11 20228
12 20227
13 20206
14 20235
15 19924
16 20213
17 20193
18 20243
19 20252
20 20212

About William Barbour

William Barbour is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Control and Systems Engineering, Automotive Engineering, Transportation and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 32 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (12 papers), Traffic control and management (10 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (6 papers), Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency (5 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (5 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (5 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (85 citations), Building and Construction (145 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (90 citations), Automotive Engineering (101 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (75 citations). William Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel B. Work, Derek Gloudemans, Junyi Ji, Abhishek Dubey, Hiba Baroud, Paul Johnson, Janey Camp, Eric J. Hall, Gautam Biswas and Marcos Quiñones-Grueiro. Their work appears in journals such as Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact