William Barbour

684 citations
35 papers · 393 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Barbour

34 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

William Barbour
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Transportation 103
  • Building and Construction 150
  • Automotive Engineering 128
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 85
  • Control and Systems Engineering 126
Replace Changqing Liu with:
Changqing Liu China
Jiateng Yin China
Yangxin Lin China
Nadir Farhi France
Shubo Wu China
Esteve Codina Spain
Lu Tong China
Peilan He Singapore
Ali Payıdar Akgüngör Türkiye
William Barbour relative to Changqing Liu China Changqing Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Changqing Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Barbour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Barbour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Barbour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Barbour. The network helps show where William Barbour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Barbour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Barbour Line = papers co-authored together William Barbour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201891
2 202344
3 202226
4 202223
5 202420
6 202120
7 201819
8 202017
9 202115
10 202414
11 202512
12 202011
13 20239
14 20228
15 20237
16 20226
17 20206
18 20195
19 20255
20 20254

About William Barbour

William Barbour is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Transportation, Automotive Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traffic control and management (14 papers), Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques (12 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (8 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (7 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (4 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers), Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency (4 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (103 citations), Building and Construction (150 citations), Automotive Engineering (128 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (85 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (126 citations). William Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel B. Work, Junyi Ji, Abhishek Kumar Dubey, Janey Smith Camp, Hiba Baroud, Paul Johnson, Eric J. Hall, Gautam Biswas, Marcos Quiñones-Grueiro and Mark Abkowitz. Their work appears in journals such as Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, IEEE Control Systems, Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Circulation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact