William Baker

8.6k citations
120 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

William Baker

92 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 48
  • Instrumentation 80
  • Literature and Literary Theory 194
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 208
  • Marketing 76
Replace Joshua Green with:
Joshua Green United States
José Luís Spain
Steven Jones United States
K.A. Jenkins United States
Hiro Saito Japan
Jonathan Swift United States
David E. Cooper United States
Leon J. Goldstein France
Martin J. Klein United States
Harry H. Hiller Canada
William Baker relative to Joshua Green United States Joshua Green's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Joshua Green · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Baker. The network helps show where William Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Baker Line = papers co-authored together William Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A generalized vortex lattice method for subsonic and supersonic flow applications
1977121
2 2012120
3 195796
4 200190
5 195881
6 199169
7 200268
8 202137
9 201437
10 201136
11 202234
12 199731
13 200031
14 200331
15 200926
16 200223
17 202221
18 201021
19 199020
20 202319

About William Baker

William Baker is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation, having authored 120 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (12 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers), Canadian Identity and History (9 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (7 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (7 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (48 citations), Instrumentation (80 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (194 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (208 citations) and Marketing (76 citations). William Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include S. J. Czyzak, Luis R. Miranda, Edward J. Lusk, Azzam N. Mansour, Patricia H. Smith, Dennis Reynolds, R. Maiolino, Jim Taylor, J. McBreen and D. C. Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Classical and Quantum Gravity, The Astrophysical Journal and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact