Mark Knight

28 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Mark Knight
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Endocrinology 36
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 67
  • Atmospheric Science 71
  • Literature and Literary Theory 39
  • Environmental Engineering 48
Replace Gregory Williams with:
Gregory Williams United States
I-Jung Liu Taiwan
Jennifer M. Lloyd United States
Radina P. Soebiyanto United States
Michael Goldblatt United States
Xingyu Huang China
Juxin Liu Canada
Farzaneh Tabnak United States
Stephanie Z. Killeen United States
Jianxin Ma China
Mark Knight relative to Gregory Williams United States Gregory Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Gregory Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Knight. The network helps show where Mark Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Knight Line = papers co-authored together Mark Knight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976138
2 201069
3 200648
4
Dictionary of nineteenth-century journalism in Great-Britain and Ireland
200831
5 200625
6 200812
7 20108
8 20048
9 20067
10 20066
11 20095
12 20025
13 20043
14 20073
15 20032
16 20182
17 20062
18 20192
19 20062
20
Chesterton, Dostoevsky and Freedom
20001

About Mark Knight

Mark Knight is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, History, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 389 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (36 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (67 citations), Atmospheric Science (71 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations) and Environmental Engineering (48 citations). Mark Knight has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include G Middlebrook, R. L. Riley, Dong‐In Lee, Alexander Ryzhkov, Emma Mason, Raj Gill, Michael W. Wood, P.T. Erskine, Halina Mikolajek and J.B. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Victorian Literature and Culture, Literature and Theology, International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church and Stability International Journal of Security and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact