William A. Webb

32 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

William A. Webb
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Theoretical Computer Science 17
  • Algebra and Number Theory 60
  • Management Science and Operations Research 127
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 31
  • Geometry and Topology 54
Replace Roger Purves with:
Roger Purves United States
Peter A. Loeb United States
Wai Kiu Chan United States
Chi-Kwong Li United States
Clark Kimberling United States
Valery A. Kalyagin Russia
N. N. Vorob’ëv Belarus
Trevor Evans Australia
Vladimir Rotar Russia
Bengt Von Bahr Sweden
William A. Webb relative to Roger Purves United States Roger Purves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Roger Purves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William A. Webb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William A. Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William A. Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William A. Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William A. Webb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William A. Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William A. Webb. The network helps show where William A. Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William A. Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William A. Webb Line = papers co-authored together William A. Webb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000178
2 196633
3 196926
4 199018
5
Near Exact and Envy Free Cake Division.
199715
6 198214
7 199312
8 199512
9 19899
10 19977
11 19667
12 19737
13 19907
14 20026
15 19835
16 19815
17 20145
18 19704
19 19973
20 19923

About William A. Webb

William A. Webb is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (9 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (7 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (6 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (2 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (17 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (60 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (127 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (31 citations) and Geometry and Topology (54 citations). William A. Webb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jack M. Robertson, Francis Edward Su, B. M. Stewart, Will Straw, Paul Edwin Potter, Qiang Wang, Daniel Panario and Bala Krishnamoorthy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematics of Computation, Computers & Mathematics with Applications and COMBINATORICA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact