William A. Webb

820 citations
40 papers · 476 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

William A. Webb

35 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

William A. Webb
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Algebra and Number Theory 78
  • Theoretical Computer Science 20
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 39
  • Management Science and Operations Research 152
  • Geometry and Topology 63
Replace Roger Purves with:
Roger Purves United States
Clark Kimberling United States
Wai Kiu Chan United States
Vladimir Rotar Russia
Gábor P. Nagy Hungary
N. N. Vorob’ëv Belarus
Valery A. Kalyagin Russia
Mathias Beiglböck Austria
J. Aczél Canada
Stephen B. Maurer United States
William A. Webb relative to Roger Purves United States Roger Purves's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Roger Purves · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William A. Webb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William A. Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William A. Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William A. Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William A. Webb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William A. Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William A. Webb. The network helps show where William A. Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William A. Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William A. Webb Line = papers co-authored together William A. Webb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000217
2 196640
3 196928
4
Near Exact and Envy Free Cake Division.
199718
5 199018
6 199517
7 198216
8 199313
9 19979
10 19899
11 19668
12 19907
13 19817
14 19737
15 20026
16 19706
17 20145
18 19835
19 19995
20 19924

About William A. Webb

William A. Webb is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytic Number Theory Research (10 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (8 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (8 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (3 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (3 papers) and Cryptography and Data Security (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (78 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (20 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (39 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (152 citations) and Geometry and Topology (63 citations). William A. Webb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Jack M. Robertson, Francis Edward Su, Paul Edwin Potter, Will Straw, B. M. Stewart, Daniel Panario, Qiang Wang and Bala Krishnamoorthy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Number Theory, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Mathematics of Computation, Acta Arithmetica and Discrete Optimization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact