Willem H. Eisma

21 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Willem H. Eisma
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Rehabilitation 343
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 201
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 120
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 255
  • Pharmacology 257
Replace W. H. Eisma with:
W. H. Eisma Netherlands
L. N. H. Göeken Netherlands
Michael Devlin Canada
Chau‐Peng Leong Taiwan
Martijn F. Pisters Netherlands
Mary Kate McDonnell United States
Arun G. Maiya India
Dominique Monnin Switzerland
Adam Garrow United Kingdom
Andrea Stancati Italy
Willem H. Eisma relative to W. H. Eisma Netherlands W. H. Eisma's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
W. H. Eisma · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Willem H. Eisma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Willem H. Eisma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Willem H. Eisma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Willem H. Eisma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Willem H. Eisma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Willem H. Eisma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Willem H. Eisma. The network helps show where Willem H. Eisma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Willem H. Eisma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Willem H. Eisma Line = papers co-authored together Willem H. Eisma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999297
2 2003200
3 199988
4 200386
5 200170
6 200168
7 200166
8 199863
9 199762
10 200548
11 199847
12 199845
13 200233
14 200333
15 199326
16 200221
17 199719
18 199818
19 199816
20 199213

About Willem H. Eisma

Willem H. Eisma is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Neurology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (343 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (201 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (120 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (255 citations) and Pharmacology (257 citations). Willem H. Eisma has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Johan W. Groothoff, L. N. H. Göeken, Annemarijke Boonstra, Tanneke Schoppen, Jaap de Vries, H. J. ten Duis, Pieter U. Dijkstra, Jan H. B. Geertzen, J.P.K. Halbertsma and Corry K. van der Sluis. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Rehabilitation, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Cancer and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact