Wei‐Ming Luh

1.1k citations
48 papers · 839 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Wei‐Ming Luh

44 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers

Wei‐Ming Luh
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Statistics and Probability 152
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
  • Social Psychology 125
  • General Health Professions 131
  • Management Science and Operations Research 70
Replace John C. Caruso with:
John C. Caruso United States
Mauricio Garnier‐Villarreal United States
Shu-Hui Lin Taiwan
Mariya P. Shiyko United States
Pascal R. Deboeck United States
Han Du United States
Veronica T. Cole United States
Helena Kadlec Canada
Jonathan D. Rubright United States
Curt Acredolo United States
Wei‐Ming Luh relative to John C. Caruso United States John C. Caruso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
John C. Caruso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Ming Luh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Ming Luh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Ming Luh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Ming Luh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Ming Luh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Ming Luh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Ming Luh. The network helps show where Wei‐Ming Luh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Ming Luh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei‐Ming Luh Line = papers co-authored together Wei‐Ming Luh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003174
2 1992144
3 201274
4 201172
5 201549
6 201348
7 199939
8 201627
9 201017
10 200117
11 200917
12 200615
13 200814
14 200712
15 200011
16 200711
17 20008
18 19998
19 20157
20 20006

About Wei‐Ming Luh

Wei‐Ming Luh is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 48 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (19 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (15 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (14 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (11 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (5 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (152 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations), Social Psychology (125 citations), General Health Professions (131 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (70 citations). Wei‐Ming Luh has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jiin‐Huarng Guo, Yue Leon Guo, Yawen Cheng, Chung-Ying Lin, Paula J. Schwanenflugel, Ai-Lun Yang, Chia-Ting Su, Hui‐Ing Ma, Chung‐Ping Cheng and Jung‐Der Wang. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, The Journal of Experimental Education, Methodology, Applied Psychological Measurement and Maturitas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact