Chung‐Ping Cheng

2.6k citations
71 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Chung‐Ping Cheng

71 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Chung‐Ping Cheng
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Clinical Psychology 553
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 303
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 258
  • Applied Psychology 87
  • Social Psychology 306
Replace Tze‐Chun Tang with:
Tze‐Chun Tang Taiwan
José A. Soto United States
Yulia Chentsova-Dutton United States
Joseph Studer Switzerland
Camilla Wasserman Sweden
Bilge Evren Türkiye
Sören Kliem Germany
Mary Katsikitis Australia
Ignacio Montero Spain
Lexine Stapinski Australia
Chung‐Ping Cheng relative to Tze‐Chun Tang Taiwan Tze‐Chun Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Tze‐Chun Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chung‐Ping Cheng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chung‐Ping Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chung‐Ping Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chung‐Ping Cheng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chung‐Ping Cheng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chung‐Ping Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chung‐Ping Cheng. The network helps show where Chung‐Ping Cheng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chung‐Ping Cheng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chung‐Ping Cheng Line = papers co-authored together Chung‐Ping Cheng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009164
2 2010124
3 2008118
4 2008102
5 201096
6 201272
7 200870
8 201164
9 201360
10 200557
11 201055
12 201254
13 200052
14 201349
15 200748
16 201548
17 201041
18 201038
19 201631
20 201530

About Chung‐Ping Cheng

Chung‐Ping Cheng is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 71 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (6 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (5 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (5 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (553 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (303 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (258 citations), Applied Psychology (87 citations) and Social Psychology (306 citations). Chung‐Ping Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cheng‐Fang Yen, Ju‐Yu Yen, Chih‐Hung Ko, Li‐Jen Weng, Chih‐Hung Ko, Yu‐Ping Chang, Chung‐Ying Lin, Pinchen Yang, Chien‐Ming Yang and Wei‐Ming Luh. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, Comprehensive Psychiatry, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Nursing Research and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact