Wei‐Ling Jiang

1.0k citations
17 papers · 921 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Wei‐Ling Jiang

17 papers receiving 875 citations

Peers

Wei‐Ling Jiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 182
  • Inorganic Chemistry 480
  • Organic Chemistry 346
  • Materials Chemistry 498
  • Catalysis 51
Replace Alejandro M. Fracaroli with:
Alejandro M. Fracaroli Argentina
Ji‐Lei Wang China
Greco González Miera United States
Ying‐Pin Chen United States
Qingchun Xia China
Kamil Sokołowski Poland
Yoshifumi Maegawa Japan
Arkaprabha Giri India
Bo Qi China
Yunbin Li China
Wei‐Ling Jiang relative to Alejandro M. Fracaroli Argentina Alejandro M. Fracaroli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Alejandro M. Fracaroli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wei‐Ling Jiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wei‐Ling Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wei‐Ling Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wei‐Ling Jiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wei‐Ling Jiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wei‐Ling Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wei‐Ling Jiang. The network helps show where Wei‐Ling Jiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wei‐Ling Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wei‐Ling Jiang Line = papers co-authored together Wei‐Ling Jiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2017263
2 2016124
3 201793
4 202080
5 201950
6 202350
7 202047
8 201647
9 202039
10 201937
11 201929
12 202024
13 202112
14 202311
15 20237
16 20236
17 20222

About Wei‐Ling Jiang

Wei‐Ling Jiang is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Biomaterials and Spectroscopy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (9 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (9 papers), Covalent Organic Framework Applications (4 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers) and Polyoxometalates: Synthesis and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (182 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (480 citations), Organic Chemistry (346 citations), Materials Chemistry (498 citations) and Catalysis (51 citations). Wei‐Ling Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bing‐Jian Yao, Yu‐Bin Dong, Luo‐Gang Ding, Hai‐Bo Yang, Jian‐Ping Ma, Yanan Li, Zhenhua Liu, Jiangtao Li, Xueliang Shi and Ying Dong. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Communications, Chemistry - A European Journal, Chem, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Organic Chemistry Frontiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact