Huiling Li

290 papers receiving 5.9k citations

Peers

Huiling Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 93
  • Electrochemistry 161
  • Molecular Biology 1.6k
  • Cancer Research 317
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 418
Replace Stanley Y. Shaw with:
Stanley Y. Shaw United States
Qian Xiang China
Yang Song China
Yali Wang China
Ling Fang China
Heng Li China
Meiying Wang China
Yi‐Ting Chen Taiwan
Kun Qian China
Yunyun Wang China
Huiling Li relative to Stanley Y. Shaw United States Stanley Y. Shaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.6×
Stanley Y. Shaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Huiling Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Huiling Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huiling Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huiling Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Huiling Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huiling Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huiling Li. The network helps show where Huiling Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Huiling Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Huiling Li Line = papers co-authored together Huiling Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 310 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020292
2 2012274
3 2022191
4 2020154
5 2018135
6 2009132
7 2006132
8 2014130
9 2022123
10 2017113
11 2021112
12 2021111
13 200992
14 200687
15 201086
16 201684
17 201883
18 200983
19 202280
20 202376

About Huiling Li

Huiling Li is a scholar working on Electrochemistry, Molecular Biology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 310 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (39 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (24 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (24 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (14 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (14 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (11 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (7 papers) and Advanced Battery Technologies Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (93 citations), Electrochemistry (161 citations), Molecular Biology (1.6k citations), Cancer Research (317 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (418 citations). Huiling Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Yifeng Tu, Shuijian He, Gaigai Duan, Ke Peng, Shufen Li, Yulan Zhang, Zhenqiong Guan, Shaobo Xie, Peng Zhou and Lin Lü. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, Microchimica Acta, Microchemical Journal, European Journal of Combinatorics and Analytical Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact