Countries where authors publish in Intestinal Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intestinal Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intestinal Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intestinal Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Intestinal Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intestinal Research.
About Intestinal Research
The 792 papers published in Intestinal Research in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Intestinal Research usually cover Gastroenterology (92 papers), Genetics (290 papers), Epidemiology (161 papers), Surgery (188 papers) and Oncology (112 papers) specifically the topics of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (284 papers), Microscopic Colitis (103 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (75 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (62 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (39 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (35 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders (34 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intestinal Research are Sung Hee Lee, Seung‐Hoon Lee, Jeong Eun Kwon, Mi‐La Cho, Sung Noh Hong, Sang Hoon Rhee, Otto S. Lin, Sunny H. Wong, Siew C. Ng and Wee Khoon Ng.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.