W.E. Hamlin

406 citations
16 papers · 306 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W.E. Hamlin

16 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

W.E. Hamlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Pharmaceutical Science 153
  • Analytical Chemistry 67
  • Filtration and Separation 13
  • Spectroscopy 93
  • Pharmacology 23
Replace Donald E. Cadwallader with:
Donald E. Cadwallader United States
J. Thurø Carstensen United States
Dale D. Maness United States
Ashok C. Shah United States
Lewis J. Leeson United States
Matthew A. Augustine United States
TOSHIO FUJINAGA Japan
Sunanda A. Ranadive United States
Ting‐Fong Chin United States
Luwei Zhao United States
W.E. Hamlin relative to Donald E. Cadwallader United States Donald E. Cadwallader's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Donald E. Cadwallader · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.E. Hamlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.E. Hamlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.E. Hamlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.E. Hamlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.E. Hamlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.E. Hamlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.E. Hamlin. The network helps show where W.E. Hamlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside W.E. Hamlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.E. Hamlin Line = papers co-authored together W.E. Hamlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 196558
2 196247
3 197342
4 196231
5 196529
6 196218
7 196118
8 196617
9 196910
10 19639
11 19606
12 19726
13 19635
14 19715
15 19514
16 19511

About W.E. Hamlin

W.E. Hamlin is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (4 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (1 paper) and Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (153 citations), Analytical Chemistry (67 citations), Filtration and Separation (13 citations), Spectroscopy (93 citations) and Pharmacology (23 citations). W.E. Hamlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John G. Wagner, William I. Higuchi, Jack I. Northam, W. Morozowich, Berton E. Ballard, Edward William Nelson, Sophie Shaw, Eino Nelson, David E. Guttman and John W. Shell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Scientific ed ).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact