Wayne D. Riggs

1.1k citations
13 papers · 345 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 1
    • Free Will and Agency 2
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2

Wayne D. Riggs

13 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Wayne D. Riggs
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Philosophy 294
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 130
  • Family Practice 12
  • History and Philosophy of Science 24
Replace Matthew A. Benton with:
Matthew A. Benton United States
Guy Axtell United States
Paulina Sliwa United Kingdom
Michael R. DePaul United States
Michael Hannon United Kingdom
Mikkel Gerken Denmark
Peter J. Markie United States
Jane Friedman United States
John Bengson United States
Abrol Fairweather United States
Wayne D. Riggs relative to Matthew A. Benton United States Matthew A. Benton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Matthew A. Benton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wayne D. Riggs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne D. Riggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne D. Riggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne D. Riggs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne D. Riggs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne D. Riggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne D. Riggs. The network helps show where Wayne D. Riggs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Wayne D. Riggs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wayne D. Riggs Line = papers co-authored together Wayne D. Riggs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown

About Wayne D. Riggs

Wayne D. Riggs is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (294 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (130 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (24 citations). Wayne D. Riggs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan L. Kvanvig. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Metaphilosophy, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact