Washington Dc
Impact in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy
Papers in
-
- Global trade, sustainability, and social impact 1
Washington Dc
10 papers receiving 277 citations
Washington Dc's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Library and Information Sciences 26
- Communication 31
- Sociology and Political Science 151
- Literature and Literary Theory 35
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 35
Countries citing papers authored by Washington Dc
This map shows the geographic impact of Washington Dc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Washington Dc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Washington Dc more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Washington Dc
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Washington Dc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Washington Dc. The network helps show where Washington Dc may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Washington Dc, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 213 |
| 2 | Models of Embedded Librarianship Final Report | 2009 | 41 |
| 3 | Key Transport Statistics of World Cities | 2013 | 13 |
| 4 | Deriving Clause Types: focusing on Korean * | 2004 | 11 |
| 5 | EPA’s Environmental Justice Collaborative Problem-Solving Model | 2008 | 8 |
| 6 | ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION AND THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY: A STAP ADVISORY DOCUMENT | 2010 | 8 |
| 7 | Labor Market Reforms, Growth, and Unemployment in Labor-Exporting MENA Countries | 2003 | 6 |
| 8 | School-based Wraparound and it's Connection to Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports: A Component of Safe/Effective Schools for all Students | 2001 | 2 |
| 9 | Review and Analysis of Zambia's Education Sector | 2002 | 1 |
| 10 | Estimating and Valuing Morbidity in a Policy Context | 1989 | 1 |
About Washington Dc
Washington Dc is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Library Science and Information Literacy (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper), African Education and Politics (1 paper), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (26 citations), Communication (31 citations), Sociology and Political Science (151 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (35 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (35 citations). Washington Dc has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Pörtner, Raffaella Zanuttini, Miok Pak, Pierre‐Richard Agénor, Tarik Yousef, Mustapha K. Nabli and Henning Tarp Jensen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.