Wanting Jiang
Impact in
-
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 1
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
- Co-authors
- Xing Wang (7 shared papers)Xiang Wang (1 shared paper)Trevor Drew (1 shared paper)Peng Wang (1 shared paper)Jing Wang (1 shared paper)Shufan Li (2 shared papers)Xin Xin (2 shared papers)Xin Xin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Geriatrics (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (1 paper)CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (1 paper)Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (1 paper)Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Wanting Jiang
10 papers receiving 361 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Biological Psychiatry 25
- Behavioral Neuroscience 18
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 22
- Neurology 22
- Physiology 65
Countries citing papers authored by Wanting Jiang
This map shows the geographic impact of Wanting Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanting Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanting Jiang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wanting Jiang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanting Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanting Jiang. The network helps show where Wanting Jiang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Wanting Jiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 160 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 |
About Wanting Jiang
Wanting Jiang is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation and Neurology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Children's Physical and Motor Development (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (22 citations), Neurology (22 citations) and Physiology (65 citations). Wanting Jiang has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Xing Wang, Xiang Wang, Trevor Drew, Peng Wang, Jing Wang, Shufan Li, Xin Xin, Xin Xin, Tao Meng and Peng Wang. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.