Wanda Haeck
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
Papers in
-
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research 5
- Signaling Pathways in Disease 2
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
- Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding 1
- Oncology 4
- Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 3
- Co-authors
- Ludo Van Den Bosch (7 shared papers)Philip Van Damme (4 shared papers)Wim Robberecht (3 shared papers)Nicole Hersmus (2 shared papers)Veronick Benoy (4 shared papers)André Bento‐Abreu (1 shared paper)Kim A. Staats (1 shared paper)Annelies Nonneman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Brain (2 papers)Neurobiology of Disease (1 paper)Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (1 paper)ACS Chemical Neuroscience (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Wanda Haeck
8 papers receiving 570 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Neurology 203
- Developmental Neuroscience 50
- Genetics 124
- Neurology 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 128
Countries citing papers authored by Wanda Haeck
This map shows the geographic impact of Wanda Haeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanda Haeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanda Haeck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wanda Haeck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanda Haeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanda Haeck. The network helps show where Wanda Haeck may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanda Haeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 216 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 65 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 |
About Wanda Haeck
Wanda Haeck is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Neurology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (5 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (1 paper), Spinal Cord Injury Research (1 paper) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (203 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (50 citations), Genetics (124 citations), Neurology (78 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (128 citations). Wanda Haeck has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ludo Van Den Bosch, Philip Van Damme, Wim Robberecht, Nicole Hersmus, Veronick Benoy, André Bento‐Abreu, Kim A. Staats, Annelies Nonneman, Thomas Philips and William D. Richardson. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurobiology of Disease, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, ACS Chemical Neuroscience and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.