W.A. Day

38 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

W.A. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Hepatology 116
  • Neurology 54
  • Dermatology 50
  • Cell Biology 98
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 99
Replace Elizabeth A. Jones with:
Elizabeth A. Jones United Kingdom
Andreas Gocht Germany
Chun Gao China
Dan Liang United States
Sonia Cunningham United States
Nader Ghebranious United States
Itaru Toyoshima Japan
Mary M. Martin United States
Takashi Katayama Japan
Bilian Jin China
W.A. Day relative to Elizabeth A. Jones United Kingdom Elizabeth A. Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Elizabeth A. Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.A. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.A. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.A. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.A. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.A. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.A. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.A. Day. The network helps show where W.A. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W.A. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.A. Day Line = papers co-authored together W.A. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201780
2
High perfusion pressure damages the sieving ability of sinusoidal endothelium in rat livers.
198066
3 197864
4 197761
5 197856
6 198849
7 198947
8 198046
9 201834
10 197234
11 198633
12 198331
13 198327
14 201625
15 200525
16
Nicotine decreases the porosity of the rat liver sieve: a possible mechanism for hypercholesterolaemia.
198821
17 200319
18 197618
19 201416
20 201515

About W.A. Day

W.A. Day is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 38 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (2 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (2 papers), Trace Elements in Health (2 papers) and Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (116 citations), Neurology (54 citations), Dermatology (50 citations), Cell Biology (98 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (99 citations). W.A. Day has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Fraser, A. R. McGiven, Robin Fraser, A. D. Blest, AG Bosanquet, J.S. Hunt, D.S. Gilbert, Kyoko Koishi, Ian S. McLennan and Robert Peach. Their work appears in journals such as Pathology, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Laboratory Investigation, Atherosclerosis and eNeuro.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact