W. M. Mitchell

1.2k citations
15 papers · 1.1k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W. M. Mitchell

14 papers receiving 971 citations

Peers

W. M. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 146
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 629
  • Biological Psychiatry 74
  • Neurology 133
  • Toxicology 33
Replace Seishi Katsumata with:
Seishi Katsumata Japan
Kara McNair United Kingdom
Kan Miyoshi Japan
Isabelle Leroux‐Nicollet France
Claudia Bregonzio Argentina
Bright N. Okine Ireland
Lipa Čičin‐Šain Croatia
Xiao-Ding Cao China
Yu‐Lin Dong China
C. Pimoule France
W. M. Mitchell relative to Seishi Katsumata Japan Seishi Katsumata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Seishi Katsumata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. M. Mitchell. The network helps show where W. M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. M. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together W. M. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1990268
2 1992201
3 1990163
4 1991103
5 196172
6 199266
7 199664
8 199053
9 199121
10 199119
11 19687
12 19585
13 19614
14 19944
15
Bilateral axillary polymastia: report of a case.
19571

About W. M. Mitchell

W. M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (146 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (629 citations), Biological Psychiatry (74 citations), Neurology (133 citations) and Toxicology (33 citations). W. M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Toshihiro Takao, Daniel E. Tracey, Anita H. Lewin, Peter Abraham, F. Ivy Carroll, Lawrence G. Sharpe, Nancy S. Pilotte, E B De Souza, Richard A. Glennon and Milt Teitler. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Endocrinology, Heart, Regulatory Peptides and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact