W. Keil

52 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

W. Keil
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Emergency Medicine 151
  • Speech and Hearing 69
  • Aging 16
  • Genetics 205
  • Toxicology 23
Replace Guido Cocchi with:
Guido Cocchi Italy
Kenneth N. Schikler United States
Patrick S. Pasquariello United States
Anu Vinod Ranade India
J. R. Alexander United Kingdom
Stavroula Papadodima Greece
Naveed Hussain United States
Donald Payne United Kingdom
Peter Gruenwald United States
Anders Kreuger Sweden
W. Keil relative to Guido Cocchi Italy Guido Cocchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Guido Cocchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Keil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Keil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Keil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Keil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Keil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Keil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Keil. The network helps show where W. Keil may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Keil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Keil Line = papers co-authored together W. Keil links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201292
2 200470
3 199867
4 198658
5 200556
6 200147
7 200543
8 198842
9 200541
10 200837
11 200134
12 199526
13 201720
14 200120
15
Deaths following methotrexate overdoses by medical staff.
200518
16 199617
17 200016
18 200615
19 201613
20
[Air embolism or putrefaction gas? The diagnosis of cardiac air embolism in the cadaver].
198013

About W. Keil

W. Keil is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Emergency Medicine, Genetics, Surgery and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 54 papers that have together received 873 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (11 papers), Restraint-Related Deaths (11 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Genital Health and Disease (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (3 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (151 citations), Speech and Hearing (69 citations), Aging (16 citations), Genetics (205 citations) and Toxicology (23 citations). W. Keil has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Berzlanovich, J. Schöpfer, Barbara Fazeny-Dörner, Thomas Waldhoer, Katja Anslinger, Burkhard Rolf, Peter Fasching, Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Birgit Bayer and Rolf Fimmers. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Legal Medicine, Forensic Science International, Legal Medicine, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact