W G Case

739 citations
29 papers · 600 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

W G Case

26 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

W G Case
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 287
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 178
  • Pharmacology 152
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 131
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 107
Replace P. Tyrer with:
P. Tyrer United Kingdom
DJ NUTT United Kingdom
Ruby Palmer United States
Robert S. Dealy United States
David E. Wheadon United States
Ward T. Smith United States
J. Staedt Germany
Christian Barnas Austria
Gian Franco Placidi Italy
Lawrence Martin United States
W G Case relative to P. Tyrer United Kingdom P. Tyrer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
P. Tyrer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W G Case

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W G Case's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W G Case with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W G Case more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W G Case

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W G Case. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W G Case. The network helps show where W G Case may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W G Case, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W G Case Line = papers co-authored together W G Case links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199173
2 198973
3
Gepirone in anxiety: a pilot study.
198770
4 199543
5 198636
6 197436
7 199935
8 196932
9 198924
10 198123
11 198222
12 197019
13 197718
14 198616
15 199815
16 197214
17 196910
18
Indications and contraindications for chronic anxiolytic treatment: is there tolerance to the anxiolytic effect?
198510
19 19869
20 19746

About W G Case

W G Case is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 29 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (13 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (11 papers), Sleep and related disorders (6 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (287 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (178 citations), Pharmacology (152 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (131 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (107 citations). W G Case has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karl Rickels, Edward E. Schweizer, I Csanalosi, R. Downing, Karl Rickels, David J. Greenblatt, Irwin Lucki, Felipe García‐España, Arthur P. Schless and Paul E. Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Pharmacopsychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact