David E. Wheadon

628 citations
11 papers · 495 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David E. Wheadon

11 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

David E. Wheadon
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 156
  • Clinical Psychology 212
  • Biological Psychiatry 22
  • Pharmacology 137
Replace B. Severin with:
B. Severin Denmark
James T. Hartford United States
P. M. Manniche Denmark
Klein Df United States
Jerónimo Saíz Spain
P. Cialdella France
S. Rasmussen Denmark
J W Jefferson United States
Rosenbaum Jf United States
J W Stewart United States
David E. Wheadon relative to B. Severin Denmark B. Severin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
B. Severin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Wheadon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Wheadon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Wheadon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Wheadon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Wheadon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Wheadon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Wheadon. The network helps show where David E. Wheadon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside David E. Wheadon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David E. Wheadon Line = papers co-authored together David E. Wheadon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 1998174
2 2003111
3 199369
4 199230
5
Lack of association between fluoxetine and suicidality in bulimia nervosa.
199226
6 198220
7 199520
8 198816
9
A double-blind, randomized study to provide safety information on switching fluoxetine-treated patients to paroxetine without an intervening washout period.
199513
10 199610
11 19956

About David E. Wheadon

David E. Wheadon is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (2 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper) and Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (156 citations), Clinical Psychology (212 citations), Biological Psychiatry (22 citations) and Pharmacology (137 citations). David E. Wheadon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Steiner, I. Gergel, William D. Bushnell, James C. Ballenger, Daniel N. Masica, Daniel B. Burnham, Eric Hollander, Andrea Allen, John H. Heiligenstein and Robert L. Zerbe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, European Neuropsychopharmacology, American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact