Vincent Egan

6.4k citations
141 papers · 4.6k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Vincent Egan

138 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Vincent Egan
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Clinical Psychology 2k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 606
  • Social Psychology 698
  • Virology 131
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 318
Replace Richard Bell with:
Richard Bell Australia
Kevin Michael King United States
Regan A. R. Gurung United States
Renata Tambelli Italy
Oi‐Man Kwok United States
Paul C. Burnett Australia
Howard A. Moss United States
Janet G. Marquis United States
Donald Kirson United States
Christopher W. Schatschneider United States
Vincent Egan relative to Richard Bell Australia Richard Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Richard Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vincent Egan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vincent Egan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vincent Egan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vincent Egan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vincent Egan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vincent Egan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vincent Egan. The network helps show where Vincent Egan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vincent Egan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vincent Egan Line = papers co-authored together Vincent Egan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 141 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005514
2 2004431
3 1996204
4 2014190
5 2013145
6 2014133
7 2000111
8 2016110
9 2006102
10 201379
11 200268
12 201968
13 202267
14 201761
15 199459
16 199459
17 201559
18 200051
19 198950
20 200350

About Vincent Egan

Vincent Egan is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Virology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 141 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (44 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (31 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (10 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (10 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (9 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (606 citations), Social Psychology (698 citations), Virology (131 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (318 citations). Vincent Egan has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth J Austin, Donald H. Saklofske, Ian J. Deary, Emma J. Palmer, Mary McMurran, Christopher R. Brand, Julian Boon, Gillian W. Shorter, Ann Chiswick and Guy M. Goodwin. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Intelligence, AIDS, Psychiatry Psychology and Law and Legal and Criminological Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact