Victoria E. Forth

23 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Victoria E. Forth
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Emergency Medicine 117
  • Family Practice 23
  • General Health Professions 164
  • Health Information Management 28
  • Physiology 121
Replace Eugene S. Chu with:
Eugene S. Chu United States
Margarita Burmester United Kingdom
Marilyn K. Szekendi United States
Michele Joseph United States
Jane Torrie New Zealand
Jennifer R. Reid United States
Patrick G. Hughes United States
Paul Robert Greig United Kingdom
Katherine Krauskopf United States
Kristi Miller United States
Victoria E. Forth relative to Eugene S. Chu United States Eugene S. Chu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Eugene S. Chu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria E. Forth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria E. Forth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria E. Forth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria E. Forth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria E. Forth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria E. Forth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria E. Forth. The network helps show where Victoria E. Forth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Victoria E. Forth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Victoria E. Forth Line = papers co-authored together Victoria E. Forth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012127
2 2010100
3 201065
4 202251
5 201448
6 202147
7 201041
8 202233
9 201232
10 201330
11 201222
12 202220
13
Communication amidst chaos: Challenges to patient communication in the emergency department
201016
14 202016
15 20207
16 20216
17 20226
18 20224
19 20234
20 20222

About Victoria E. Forth

Victoria E. Forth is a scholar working on Physiology, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions and Family Practice, having authored 26 papers that have together received 682 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (10 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (4 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (3 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (117 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), General Health Professions (164 citations), Health Information Management (28 citations) and Physiology (121 citations). Victoria E. Forth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and China. Frequent co-authors include Mark V. Williams, Danielle M. McCarthy, Barbara A. Buckley, Kirsten G. Engel, James G. Adams, J. Michael Schmidt, Kevin J. O’Leary, Gregory T. Makoul, Jungwha Julia Lee and Eric A. Coleman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Journal of Hospital Medicine, Academic Emergency Medicine, Journal of the National Medical Association and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact