Vered Halamish

1.1k citations
26 papers · 746 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Vered Halamish

25 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Vered Halamish
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 414
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 276
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
  • General Decision Sciences 17
  • Applied Psychology 39
Replace Damian P. Birney with:
Damian P. Birney Australia
Brady Butterfield United States
Mark C. Fox United States
Michael K. Gardner United States
Veronica X. Yan United States
Paul W. Foos United States
Sean M. Lane United States
Franklin M. Zaromb United States
Janet E. Davidson United States
Dan J. Woltz United States
Vered Halamish relative to Damian P. Birney Australia Damian P. Birney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Damian P. Birney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vered Halamish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vered Halamish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vered Halamish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vered Halamish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vered Halamish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vered Halamish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vered Halamish. The network helps show where Vered Halamish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Vered Halamish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vered Halamish Line = papers co-authored together Vered Halamish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011146
2 201478
3 201964
4 201559
5 201158
6 200751
7 201348
8 201141
9 201838
10 201830
11 201923
12 202221
13 201317
14 201715
15 201814
16 20239
17 20137
18 20226
19 20245
20 20165

About Vered Halamish

Vered Halamish is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 26 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (14 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (7 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (414 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (276 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations), General Decision Sciences (17 citations) and Applied Psychology (39 citations). Vered Halamish has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Bjork, Gitit Kavé, Alan D. Castel, Nira Liberman, Tami Katzir, Nicholas C. Soderstrom, Elizabeth Ligon Bjork, Shannon McGillivray, Monika Undorf and Morris Goldsmith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Memory & Cognition, Psychology and Aging and Computers & Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact