V. Dohm

2.7k citations
105 papers · 2.2k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

V. Dohm

103 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

V. Dohm
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.5k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 505
  • Mathematical Physics 307
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 186
Replace B. Jancovici with:
B. Jancovici France
C. Bervillier France
Massimo Campostrini Italy
J. F. Nicoll United States
V. Tognetti Italy
Yadin Y. Goldschmidt United States
B. Rosenstein Taiwan
Michael Stone United States
J. H. Hetherington United States
H.B. Nielsen Denmark
V. Dohm relative to B. Jancovici France B. Jancovici's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
B. Jancovici · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by V. Dohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Dohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Dohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Dohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Dohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Dohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Dohm. The network helps show where V. Dohm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside V. Dohm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with V. Dohm Line = papers co-authored together V. Dohm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 105 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989141
2 1981110
3 1985100
4 198570
5 199361
6 199061
7 198859
8 198756
9 200453
10 199151
11 198750
12 198149
13 198942
14 198037
15 200836
16 199236
17 199035
18 199533
19 199133
20 199832

About V. Dohm

V. Dohm is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 105 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (53 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (49 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (31 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (19 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (18 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (15 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (12 papers) and Quantum many-body systems (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (505 citations), Mathematical Physics (307 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (186 citations). V. Dohm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include R. Folk, R. Haussmann, D.J. Frank, R. K. P. Zia, Richard Bausch, H. K. Janssen, William Huhn, Xiaofang Chen, Joseph Pankert and Richard A. Ferrell. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal B, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and Physica B Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact