R. Folk

3.2k citations
155 papers · 2.5k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

R. Folk

147 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

R. Folk
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Condensed Matter Physics 1.3k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 487
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 971
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 279
  • Mathematical Physics 192
Replace Tohru Morita with:
Tohru Morita Japan
Jayanta K. Bhattacharjee India
John R. Ray United States
M. L. Glasser United States
Natsuki Hashitsume Japan
G S Joyce United Kingdom
D. N. Zubarev Russia
M. A. Moore United Kingdom
I. P. Omelyan Ukraine
H. N. V. Temperley United Kingdom
R. Folk relative to Tohru Morita Japan Tohru Morita's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Tohru Morita · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Folk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Folk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Folk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Folk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Folk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Folk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Folk. The network helps show where R. Folk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Folk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Folk Line = papers co-authored together R. Folk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003182
2 2006119
3 197697
4 200293
5 200390
6 200284
7
二臨界点と四臨界点の場の理論 II.緩和動力学
200865
8 200165
9 200361
10 200057
11 197954
12 198151
13 199646
14 199542
15 198541
16 200540
17 200039
18 198039
19 199839
20 199838

About R. Folk

R. Folk is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 155 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (75 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (37 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (33 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (22 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (21 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (15 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (13 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.3k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (487 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (971 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (279 citations) and Mathematical Physics (192 citations). R. Folk has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Ukraine and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Moser, I. M. Mryglod, I. P. Omelyan, Yurij V. Holovatch, Harald Iro, V. Dohm, Taras Yavors’kii, Franz Schwabl, M. Dudka and Walter D. Fenz. Their work appears in journals such as The European Physical Journal B, Physical Review Letters, Network Computation in Neural Systems, Journal of Low Temperature Physics and Physics Letters A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact