Ute Pohl

40 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Ute Pohl's Hit Papers

DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours 2018 · 2.2k citations
2.2k0+2+5Years since publication5001k1.5k2k

Peers

Ute Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Genetics 2.3k
  • Health Informatics 49
  • Cancer Research 264
  • Molecular Biology 887
  • Neurology 128
Replace Leonille Schweizer with:
Leonille Schweizer Germany
Arend Koch Germany
Stefanie Brehmer Germany
Mélanie Pagès France
Ekkehard Hewer Switzerland
Anne Kristin Braczynski Germany
Patricia Kohlhof Germany
Marcel Seiz‐Rosenhagen Germany
Jonathan Serrano United States
Florian Selt Germany
Ute Pohl relative to Leonille Schweizer Germany Leonille Schweizer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leonille Schweizer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Pohl. The network helps show where Ute Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Ute Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours
Hit paper breakdown →
20182219
2
Gene expression-based classification of malignant gliomas correlates better with survival than histological classification.
2003786
3 2018239
4 2000110
5 2019104
6 200081
7 200075
8 201269
9 202068
10 202159
11 201948
12 200343
13 199940
14 202139
15 200734
16 199923
17 200622
18 200819
19 202219
20 199917

About Ute Pohl

Ute Pohl is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology, Oncology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (22 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (2 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (2 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (2.3k citations), Health Informatics (49 citations), Cancer Research (264 citations), Molecular Biology (887 citations) and Neurology (128 citations). Ute Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include David N. Louis, Andreas von Deimling, Catherine L. Nutt, Margaret E. McLaughlin, Pablo Tamayo, John Gregory Cairncross, Tracy T. Batchelor, Peter McL. Black, D.R. Mani and Scott L. Pomeroy. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Neuropathologica, Genomics, Neuro-Oncology, International Journal of Oncology and Clinical Neuropathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact