Ute Karbach

55 papers receiving 783 citations

Peers

Ute Karbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • General Health Professions 191
  • Health Information Management 28
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 165
  • Family Practice 10
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 6
Replace Nina Rachel Sperber with:
Nina Rachel Sperber United States
Su‐Ying Liang United States
Gaston Arnolda Australia
Kristin Van Busum United States
Benjamin Washington United States
Sharron O’Neill Australia
Eileen E. Reynolds United States
Roy E. Pardee United States
Bahareh Yazdizadeh Iran
Olga Catherina Damman Netherlands
Ute Karbach relative to Nina Rachel Sperber United States Nina Rachel Sperber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Nina Rachel Sperber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Karbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Karbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Karbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Karbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Karbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Karbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Karbach. The network helps show where Ute Karbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Karbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Karbach Line = papers co-authored together Ute Karbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200968
2 201464
3 201159
4 201657
5 201243
6 200942
7 201733
8 201931
9 201226
10 201526
11 200922
12 201520
13 201019
14 202017
15 202117
16 202115
17 201814
18 201013
19 201713
20 201113

About Ute Karbach

Ute Karbach is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health and Medical Studies (11 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (7 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (191 citations), Health Information Management (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (165 citations), Family Practice (10 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations). Ute Karbach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Holger Pfaff, Nicole Ernstmann, Nadine Scholten, Oliver Ommen, Maren Galushko, Raymond Voltz, Ingrid Schübert, Thorsten Meyer, Corina Guethlin and Christine Holmberg. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, BMJ Open, Supportive Care in Cancer, BMC Family Practice and Implementation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact