Julia Strupp

47 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Julia Strupp
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 136
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 201
  • Clinical Psychology 85
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 19
  • Applied Psychology 14
Replace Hanneke van der Meide with:
Hanneke van der Meide Netherlands
Kathleen Deas Australia
Minke Goldsteen Netherlands
Carmen D. Ng United States
Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez Spain
Jörg Klewer Germany
Gail Eva United Kingdom
Jonathan Avery Canada
Zahra Ezabadi Iran
Giannoula Tsakitzidis Belgium
Julia Strupp relative to Hanneke van der Meide Netherlands Hanneke van der Meide's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Hanneke van der Meide · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Strupp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Strupp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Strupp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Strupp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Strupp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Strupp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Strupp. The network helps show where Julia Strupp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Strupp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Strupp Line = papers co-authored together Julia Strupp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201260
2 201458
3 202135
4 201433
5 201926
6 201125
7 201525
8 201618
9 201418
10 202016
11 201414
12 201714
13 201813
14 202213
15 202213
16 201412
17 201812
18 202012
19 201712
20 202111

About Julia Strupp

Julia Strupp is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (21 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (9 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers) and Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (136 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (201 citations), Clinical Psychology (85 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (19 citations) and Applied Psychology (14 citations). Julia Strupp has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Raymond Voltz, Heidrun Golla, Maren Galushko, Holger Pfaff, Christian Rietz, Nicole Ernstmann, Ute Karbach, Moritz Hahn, Christoph Ostgathe and Vanessa Romotzky. Their work appears in journals such as Palliative & Supportive Care, BMC Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine, BMC Health Services Research and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact