Ute Deichmann

971 citations
52 papers · 577 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Deichmann

49 papers receiving 536 citations

Peers

Ute Deichmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • History and Philosophy of Science 122
  • History 68
  • Genetics 127
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 54
Replace Soraya de Chadarevian with:
Soraya de Chadarevian United States
Robert Olby United Kingdom
Harmke Kamminga United Kingdom
Elof Axel Carlson United States
Toby Α. Appel United States
Pnina G. Abir-Am United States
Leonard G. Wilson United States
Karen A. Rader United States
Marsha L. Richmond United States
Frederick B. Churchill United States
Ute Deichmann relative to Soraya de Chadarevian United States Soraya de Chadarevian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
Soraya de Chadarevian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Deichmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Deichmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Deichmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Deichmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Deichmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Deichmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Deichmann. The network helps show where Ute Deichmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ute Deichmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Deichmann Line = papers co-authored together Ute Deichmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016118
2 201363
3 199848
4 200142
5 199828
6 199627
7 200221
8 200720
9 199918
10 202016
11 200216
12 200416
13
Biologen unter Hitler : Vertreibung, Karrieren, Forschung
199214
14 201512
15 201111
16 201610
17 20127
18 20176
19 20146
20 20096

About Ute Deichmann

Ute Deichmann is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, History, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 577 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Research (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (9 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Historical Medical Research and Treatments (6 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (6 papers), Evolution and Science Education (5 papers) and European history and politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (122 citations), History (68 citations), Genetics (127 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (54 citations). Ute Deichmann has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Benno Müller‐Hill, Athel Cornish‐Bowden, Stefan Schuster, Jean‐Pierre Mazat and Anthony S. Travis. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives in biology and medicine, Nature, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact