Ute Deichmann

987 citations
56 papers · 662 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ute Deichmann

52 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Ute Deichmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • History and Philosophy of Science 149
  • History 72
  • Genetics 148
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
  • Molecular Biology 234
Replace Harmke Kamminga with:
Harmke Kamminga United Kingdom
Soraya de Chadarevian United States
Robert Olby United Kingdom
Lois N. Magner United States
Elof Axel Carlson United States
Toby Α. Appel United States
Pnina G. Abir-Am United States
Karen A. Rader United States
Pietro Corsi France
Leonard G. Wilson United States
Ute Deichmann relative to Harmke Kamminga United Kingdom Harmke Kamminga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Harmke Kamminga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Deichmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Deichmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Deichmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Deichmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Deichmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Deichmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Deichmann. The network helps show where Ute Deichmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ute Deichmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Deichmann Line = papers co-authored together Ute Deichmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016144
2 201363
3 199855
4 200150
5 199829
6 199627
7 200723
8 200222
9 199921
10 202017
11 200417
12 200217
13
Biologen unter Hitler : Vertreibung, Karrieren, Forschung
199215
14 201514
15 201111
16 201611
17 20109
18 20128
19
Jews and Sciences in German Contexts: Case Studies from the 19th and 20th Centuries
20078
20 20028

About Ute Deichmann

Ute Deichmann is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology, History, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical History and Research (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Origins and Evolution of Life (10 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (6 papers), Historical Medical Research and Treatments (6 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (6 papers), Evolution and Science Education (6 papers) and European history and politics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (149 citations), History (72 citations), Genetics (148 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations) and Molecular Biology (234 citations). Ute Deichmann has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Benno Müller‐Hill, Stefan Schuster, Jean‐Pierre Mazat, Athel Cornish‐Bowden and Anthony S. Travis. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives in biology and medicine, Nature, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Developmental Biology and Journal for General Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact