Robert Olby

1.9k citations
54 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Olby

46 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers

Robert Olby
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • History and Philosophy of Science 466
  • General Psychology 13
  • History 75
  • Genetics 170
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
Replace Lily E. Kay with:
Lily E. Kay United States
Garland E. Allen United States
Mary P. Winsor Canada
John Beatty United States
Gerald L. Geison United States
Lois N. Magner United States
Pnina G. Abir-Am United States
Staffan Müller‐Wille Germany
William C. Wimsatt United States
Nils Roll‐Hansen Norway
Robert Olby relative to Lily E. Kay United States Lily E. Kay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Lily E. Kay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Olby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Olby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Olby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Olby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Olby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Olby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Olby. The network helps show where Robert Olby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Robert Olby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Olby Line = papers co-authored together Robert Olby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The path to the double helix
1974163
2 1992109
3
The path to the double helix : the discovery of DNA
199499
4
Origins of Mendelism
196698
5 197992
6 199965
7 198945
8 199534
9 198732
10 197627
11 197124
12 199123
13 198921
14 196319
15 196816
16
Francis Crick: Hunter of Life’s Secrets
200916
17 200014
18 200011
19
Francis Crick, DNA, and the Central Dogma.
197010
20 19707

About Robert Olby

Robert Olby is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Evolution and Science Education (4 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (3 papers), Medical History and Research (2 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (466 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), History (75 citations), Genetics (170 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). Robert Olby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include M. J. S. Hodge, Dirk Stemerding, Peter F. Stevens, Geoffrey Cantor, Mary P. Winsor, John Christie, Marjorie Grene, Nils Roll‐Hansen, Warren O. Hagstrom and Donald T. Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The British Journal for the History of Science, Journal of the History of Biology, Annals of Science and Heredity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact