Uta‐Carolin Pietsch

20 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers

Uta‐Carolin Pietsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Transplantation 25
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 44
  • Ophthalmology 46
  • Hepatology 32
  • Physiology 18
Replace M Matsunaga with:
M Matsunaga Japan
Emre Yıldırım Türkiye
D. Soragna Italy
Brendan J. Conlon Ireland
Hiroto Ohata Japan
Éva Csajbók Hungary
P Laget France
B Zetterström Sweden
Markus Resch Germany
Uta‐Carolin Pietsch relative to M Matsunaga Japan M Matsunaga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
M Matsunaga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Uta‐Carolin Pietsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Uta‐Carolin Pietsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Uta‐Carolin Pietsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Uta‐Carolin Pietsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Uta‐Carolin Pietsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Uta‐Carolin Pietsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Uta‐Carolin Pietsch. The network helps show where Uta‐Carolin Pietsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Uta‐Carolin Pietsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Uta‐Carolin Pietsch Line = papers co-authored together Uta‐Carolin Pietsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006111
2 201363
3 201060
4 202244
5 200630
6 201026
7 200220
8 201320
9 200719
10 200319
11 200519
12 200518
13 200317
14 201013
15 200510
16 20215
17 20083
18 20231
19 20041
20 20081

About Uta‐Carolin Pietsch

Uta‐Carolin Pietsch is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (25 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (44 citations), Ophthalmology (46 citations), Hepatology (32 citations) and Physiology (18 citations). Uta‐Carolin Pietsch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Susann Uhlmann, Andreas Bringmann, Peter Wiedemann, Andreas Reichenbach, Ianors Iandiev, Johann Hauss, Antje Wurm, Thomas Pannicke, Udo X. Kaisers and Dirk Uhlmann. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, BMC Anesthesiology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact