Ursula Münster
Impact in
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Papers in
-
- Geographies of human-animal interactions 4
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 3
- Co-authors
- Thom van Dooren (1 shared paper)Eben Kirksey (1 shared paper)Daniel Münster (1 shared paper)Celia Lowe (1 shared paper)Cristina Brito (1 shared paper)Claudia Lang (1 shared paper)Susanna Lidström (1 shared paper)Kate Rigby (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Environmental Humanities (2 papers)Development and Change (1 paper)Ethnos (1 paper)Economic and political weekly (1 paper)Global Environment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSri Lanka
In The Last Decade
Ursula Münster
7 papers receiving 454 citations
Ursula Münster's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Geography, Planning and Development 271
- Cultural Studies 60
- Anthropology 67
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 56
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 44
Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Münster
This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Münster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Münster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Münster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Münster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Münster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Münster. The network helps show where Ursula Münster may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ursula Münster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Multispecies Studies Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 382 |
| 2 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 4 | In the Jungle of Law Adivasi Rights and Implementation of Forest Rights Act in Kerala | 2012 | 14 |
| 5 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 6 | Soziale Ästhetik, Atmosphäre, Medialität | 2017 | 1 |
| 7 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 0 |
About Ursula Münster
Ursula Münster is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Global and Planetary Change, Anthropology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper), American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1 paper) and Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (271 citations), Cultural Studies (60 citations), Anthropology (67 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (56 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (44 citations). Ursula Münster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sri Lanka. Frequent co-authors include Thom van Dooren, Eben Kirksey, Daniel Münster, Celia Lowe, Cristina Brito, Claudia Lang, Susanna Lidström, Kate Rigby and Libby Robin. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Humanities, Development and Change, Ethnos, Economic and political weekly and Global Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.