Daniel Münster

436 citations
13 papers · 219 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Münster

12 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Daniel Münster
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78
  • Geography, Planning and Development 25
  • Anthropology 37
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
Replace Liliana R. Goldín with:
Liliana R. Goldín United States
Rudi Colloredo‐Mansfeld United States
Raymond B. Craib United States
A.R. Vasavi India
David Nally United Kingdom
Penelope Francks United Kingdom
Euclides Gonçalves United Kingdom
Giovanna Micarelli Colombia
Michael Brown United States
Víctor Bretón Solo de Zaldívar Spain
Daniel Münster relative to Liliana R. Goldín United States Liliana R. Goldín's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Liliana R. Goldín · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Münster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Münster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Münster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Münster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Münster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Münster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Münster. The network helps show where Daniel Münster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Münster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Münster Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Münster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201246
2 201238
3
Book Review: India's middle class: New forms of urban leisure, consumption and prosperity by Christiane Brosius. New Delhi: Routledge, 2010.
201433
4 201525
5 201316
6 202116
7 201415
8 201614
9 20226
10 20166
11 20072
12
The making of neoliberal India
20142
13 20220

About Daniel Münster

Daniel Münster is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 13 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Social and Economic Development in India (3 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (2 papers), Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (1 paper) and Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (78 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (25 citations), Anthropology (37 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations). Daniel Münster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ursula Münster, Christian Strümpell, Carol Upadhya and Siddhartha Krishnan. Their work appears in journals such as Contributions to Indian Sociology, Current Anthropology, Development and Change, Modern Asian Studies and Focaal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact