T.W. Smith

794 citations
25 papers · 694 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

T.W. Smith

25 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

T.W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 366
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 66
  • Physiology 324
  • Gastroenterology 36
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 28
Replace Debra E. Gmerek with:
Debra E. Gmerek United States
Giuseppe Clementi Italy
Steve Bramwell United Kingdom
I. Angel France
F. Porreca United States
Philip J. Monroe United States
Sou Katsuyama Japan
Russell J. Sheldon United States
Sevasti Gaspari United States
Mayumi Nakajima Japan
T.W. Smith relative to Debra E. Gmerek United States Debra E. Gmerek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Debra E. Gmerek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.W. Smith. The network helps show where T.W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together T.W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982103
2 198983
3 198873
4 198659
5 198454
6 198835
7 198831
8 198127
9 200025
10 197924
11 198524
12
Antinociceptive models displaying peripheral opioid activity.
198522
13 197622
14 198821
15 198920
16
Release of spasmogenic substances induced by vasoactive amines from isolated lungs.
197220
17 198515
18 198410
19 19928
20 19747

About T.W. Smith

T.W. Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (12 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (366 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (66 citations), Physiology (324 citations), Gastroenterology (36 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (28 citations). T.W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Buchan, Stephen J. Clark, Stephen Wilkinson, C. Schneider, John J. Adcock, R.L. Follenfant, Peter C. Buchan, Juliann G. Kiang, Y.S. Bakhle and George W. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Pain, Neuropeptides and European Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact