Tony Coxon

686 citations
9 papers · 438 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Tony Coxon

8 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers

Tony Coxon
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Statistics and Probability 60
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
  • Management Science and Operations Research 62
  • Information Systems and Management 20
  • Sociology and Political Science 113
Replace Antony Fielding with:
Antony Fielding United Kingdom
Mark Garner United Kingdom
J. van der Zouwen Netherlands
Keith McNeil United States
Mary W. Gray United States
Peter Hill Australia
Fred Massarik United States
Geoffrey Woodhouse United Kingdom
Linda Haggarty United Kingdom
Gideon Vigderhous Canada
Tony Coxon relative to Antony Fielding United Kingdom Antony Fielding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Antony Fielding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tony Coxon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tony Coxon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tony Coxon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tony Coxon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tony Coxon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tony Coxon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tony Coxon. The network helps show where Tony Coxon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Tony Coxon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tony Coxon Line = papers co-authored together Tony Coxon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1974295
2
Demographic Review of the UK Social Sciences
200660
3 197537
4 198835
5 19936
6 19832
7 19882
8
Scoping Study into Quantitative Methods Capacity Building in Scotland
20081
9 20200

About Tony Coxon

Tony Coxon is a scholar working on Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 438 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (60 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (12 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (62 citations), Information Systems and Management (20 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (113 citations). Tony Coxon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Otis Dudley Duncan, Arthur S. Goldberger, H. M. Blalock, J.E. Spencer, Mark Easterby‐Smith, Andrew J. Hunt, Peter M. Davies, T. J. McManus, Peter Weatherburn and Tom J. McManus. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Sociology, The Sociological Review, Sociology of Health & Illness and ERA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact