Tomasz Cetner

1.2k citations
42 papers · 459 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tomasz Cetner

39 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Tomasz Cetner
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 418
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 262
  • Biomaterials 64
  • Materials Chemistry 118
  • Accounting 26
Replace M. Bhatia with:
M. Bhatia United States
Daniel Gajda Poland
Wenbin Qiu Australia
S. Bohnenstiehl United States
B. J. Senkowicz United States
M. Burdusel Romania
C. Beneduce Switzerland
Shinya Ueda Japan
G. Ripamonti Italy
J. E. Giencke United States
Tomasz Cetner relative to M. Bhatia United States M. Bhatia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
M. Bhatia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomasz Cetner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomasz Cetner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomasz Cetner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomasz Cetner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomasz Cetner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomasz Cetner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomasz Cetner. The network helps show where Tomasz Cetner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomasz Cetner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomasz Cetner Line = papers co-authored together Tomasz Cetner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 201424
3 201723
4 201623
5 201522
6 201321
7 201721
8 201620
9 201620
10 201619
11 201118
12 201218
13 201717
14 201517
15 201815
16 202115
17 201613
18 201813
19 20159
20 20238

About Tomasz Cetner

Tomasz Cetner is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Accounting, Biomedical Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (31 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (29 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (29 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (6 papers), Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (5 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (418 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (262 citations), Biomaterials (64 citations), Materials Chemistry (118 citations) and Accounting (26 citations). Tomasz Cetner has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include A. Morawski, Daniel Gajda, A. Zaleski, M. Rindfleisch, Md. Shahriar A. Hossain, R. Diduszko, Matthew Rindfleisch, A. Presz, M. Tomsic and M. Małecka. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Scripta Materialia and Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact