Daniel Gajda

1.0k citations
83 papers · 859 · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Gajda

76 papers receiving 847 citations

Peers

Daniel Gajda
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Condensed Matter Physics 769
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 435
  • Biomaterials 137
  • Materials Chemistry 210
  • Biomedical Engineering 122
Replace Matthew Rindfleisch with:
Matthew Rindfleisch United States
Yongchang Liu China
C Rodig Germany
Tomasz Cetner Poland
M. Bhatia United States
M. Burdusel Romania
T. Cavallin Italy
E. Wertz United States
Kijoon H. P. Kim South Korea
D.Q. Shi Australia
Daniel Gajda relative to Matthew Rindfleisch United States Matthew Rindfleisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Matthew Rindfleisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Gajda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Gajda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Gajda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Gajda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Gajda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Gajda. The network helps show where Daniel Gajda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Gajda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Gajda Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Gajda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201551
2 202436
3 201628
4 201424
5 201323
6 201823
7 201723
8 201623
9 201523
10 201522
11 201722
12 201621
13 201721
14 201321
15 201521
16 201721
17 201620
18 200720
19 201819
20 201619

About Daniel Gajda

Daniel Gajda is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials, having authored 83 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (70 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (58 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (40 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (15 papers), Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (13 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (5 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (5 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (769 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (435 citations), Biomaterials (137 citations), Materials Chemistry (210 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (122 citations). Daniel Gajda has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Australia and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include A. Morawski, A. Zaleski, Tomasz Cetner, Md. Shahriar A. Hossain, M. Rindfleisch, Hakan Yetiş, İ. Belenli, Fırat Karaboğa, Mustafa Akdoğan and M. Małecka. Their work appears in journals such as Superconductor Science and Technology, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Materials, Journal of Applied Physics and Physica C Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact