J. E. Giencke
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
-
- Iron-based superconductors research
Papers in
-
- Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys 9
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism 8
-
- Iron-based superconductors research 6
- Co-authors
- Chang‐Beom Eom (9 shared papers)B. J. Senkowicz (2 shared papers)E. E. Hellstrom (3 shared papers)D. C. Larbalestier (4 shared papers)S. Patnaik (3 shared papers)Joan M. Redwing (3 shared papers)J. Chen (3 shared papers)X. X. Xi (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Applied Physics Letters (3 papers)Superconductor Science and Technology (2 papers)Physica C Superconductivity (1 paper)Journal of Applied Physics (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyIndia
In The Last Decade
J. E. Giencke
9 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
- Condensed Matter Physics 316
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 172
- Biomaterials 57
- Materials Chemistry 105
- Biomedical Engineering 19
Countries citing papers authored by J. E. Giencke
This map shows the geographic impact of J. E. Giencke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. E. Giencke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. E. Giencke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. E. Giencke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. E. Giencke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. E. Giencke. The network helps show where J. E. Giencke may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. E. Giencke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 138 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 77 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 9 | Significant enhancement of the upper critical field in the two-gap superconductor MgB2 by selective tuning of impurity scattering | 2003 | 1 |
About J. E. Giencke
J. E. Giencke is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 9 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (9 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper), Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (1 paper), Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications (1 paper) and Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (316 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (172 citations), Biomaterials (57 citations), Materials Chemistry (105 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (19 citations). J. E. Giencke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Chang‐Beom Eom, B. J. Senkowicz, E. E. Hellstrom, D. C. Larbalestier, S. Patnaik, Joan M. Redwing, J. Chen, X. X. Xi, A. V. Pogrebnyakov and Darrell G. Schlom. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Superconductor Science and Technology, Physica C Superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics and IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.