Tomas Lämås

2.3k citations
57 papers · 1.8k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Tomas Lämås

53 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Tomas Lämås
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Insect Science 744
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 676
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Environmental Engineering 316
  • Ecological Modeling 85
Replace Susanna Nocentini with:
Susanna Nocentini Italy
José Ramón González‐Olabarria Spain
Andreas Schuck Finland
Petra Lasch‐Born Germany
Stephen R. Shifley United States
Arne Pommerening Sweden
Robert G. Wagner United States
Verena C. Griess Canada
Marc Palahí Finland
Marek Fabrika Slovakia
Tomas Lämås relative to Susanna Nocentini Italy Susanna Nocentini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Susanna Nocentini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Lämås

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Lämås's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Lämås with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Lämås more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Lämås

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Lämås. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Lämås. The network helps show where Tomas Lämås may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Lämås, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomas Lämås Line = papers co-authored together Tomas Lämås links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview
2011188
2 1999161
3 1999126
4 2005104
5 201992
6 201481
7 201372
8 201761
9 200552
10 200346
11 200346
12 200646
13 199845
14 200640
15 200540
16 201737
17 199836
18 201836
19 201635
20 201135

About Tomas Lämås

Tomas Lämås is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Environmental Engineering and Ecology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (39 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (26 papers), Forest ecology and management (26 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (15 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (5 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (744 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (676 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Environmental Engineering (316 citations) and Ecological Modeling (85 citations). Tomas Lämås has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karin Öhman, Göran Ståhl, Clas Fries, Peder Wikström, Ljusk Ola Eriksson, Nicholas Kruys, Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Jeannette Eggers, Torgny Lind and Jörgen Wallerman. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Environmental Management and AMBIO.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact