Anna Sténs

1.3k citations
22 papers · 1.1k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Sténs

21 papers receiving 1k citations

Peers

Anna Sténs
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Global and Planetary Change 615
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 224
  • Forestry 27
  • Insect Science 74
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41
Replace João Azevedo with:
João Azevedo Portugal
Thomas James STRAKA United States
Christo Marais South Africa
Charles R. Blinn United States
Irina Prokofieva Spain
Ian A. Munn United States
Till Pistorius Germany
Douglas R. Carter United States
Kari Bisbee O’Connell United States
Andrej Ficko Slovenia
Anna Sténs relative to João Azevedo Portugal João Azevedo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
João Azevedo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Sténs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Sténs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Sténs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Sténs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Sténs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Sténs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Sténs. The network helps show where Anna Sténs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Sténs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Sténs Line = papers co-authored together Anna Sténs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016234
2 2015194
3 2018128
4 2019102
5 201692
6 201659
7 201245
8 201934
9 201632
10 201732
11 201422
12 202219
13 201617
14 201915
15 201514
16 201912
17 20167
18 20173
19
Allemansrätten : Hinder eller möjlighet för grönt entreprenörskap?
20141
20
Skogens estetiska värden
20141

About Anna Sténs

Anna Sténs is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Soil Science and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Management and Policy (17 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (2 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (2 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Environmental law and policy (1 paper), Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (1 paper) and Art, Aesthetics, and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (615 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (224 citations), Forestry (27 citations), Insect Science (74 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (41 citations). Anna Sténs has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Camilla Sandström, Thomas Ranius, Karin Beland Lindahl, Johanna Johansson, Jean‐Michel Roberge, Rolf Lidskog, Adam Felton, Therese Bjärstig, Erland Mårald and Jörgen Sjögren. Their work appears in journals such as AMBIO, Forest Policy and Economics, Journal of Environmental Management, Small-scale Forestry and Transfer European Review of Labour and Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact