Tom Young

2.9k citations
126 papers · 2.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Young

122 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Tom Young's Hit Papers

Malting and Brewing Science 1982 · 479 citations
4790+14+29Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Tom Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Food Science 726
  • Cell Biology 429
  • Biotechnology 154
  • Small Animals 172
  • Molecular Biology 1k
Replace Steven Michael Lonergan with:
Steven Michael Lonergan United States
Teruo Sone Japan
Jin‐Cheol Kim South Korea
Kozo Asano Japan
Emmanuel Coton France
Lloyd Bernard Bullerman United States
Johan L.F. Kock South Africa
L. G. Butler United States
Florence C. Richard-Forget France
Ralph L. Nicholson United States
Tom Young relative to Steven Michael Lonergan United States Steven Michael Lonergan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Steven Michael Lonergan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Young. The network helps show where Tom Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Young Line = papers co-authored together Tom Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Malting and Brewing Science
Hit paper breakdown →
1982479
2 1975144
3 1988103
4 198194
5 199882
6 200171
7 198165
8 197964
9 197363
10 197849
11 198544
12 199643
13 199541
14 199333
15 196932
16 200131
17 197330
18 198229
19 198429
20 199529

About Tom Young

Tom Young is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Food Science, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Insect Science, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (48 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (42 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (26 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (20 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (20 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (16 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (12 papers) and Food composition and properties (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (726 citations), Cell Biology (429 citations), Biotechnology (154 citations), Small Animals (172 citations) and Molecular Biology (1k citations). Tom Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include D.N. Pegler, James S. Hough, D. E. Briggs, P. Jeffries, Nicholas J. Kuhn, Simon Ward, Stephen T. Moss, Ronald H. Petersen, Michael Lewis and Stephen L. Sturley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Mycologia, Annals of Botany, Archives of Microbiology and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact