Tom Young
Impact in
- Food Science top 1%
- Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Microbiology top 5%
Papers in
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 38
- Horticultural and Viticultural Research 8
-
- Fungal and yeast genetics research 12
- Co-authors
- D.N. Pegler (26 shared papers)J. S. Hough (13 shared papers)D. E. Briggs (12 shared papers)P. Jeffries (8 shared papers)Stephen T. Moss (2 shared papers)Simon Ward (3 shared papers)Nicholas J. Kuhn (3 shared papers)Rebecca Stevens (9 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the Institute of Brewing (18 papers)Mycologia (7 papers)Annals of Botany (5 papers)Archives of Microbiology (3 papers)Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Tom Young
134 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Tom Young's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Food Science 804
- Microbiology 27
- Cell Biology 567
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 341
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Young
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Young. The network helps show where Tom Young may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 137 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Malting and Brewing Science Hit paper breakdown → | 1982 | 485 |
| 2 | 1975 | 145 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 104 | |
| 4 | 1981 | 95 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 82 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 82 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 70 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 70 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 66 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 63 | |
| 11 | 1978 | 49 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 46 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 40 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 36 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 32 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 32 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 32 | |
| 20 | 1973 | 31 |
About Tom Young
Tom Young is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Food Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 137 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (38 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (33 papers), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (29 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (19 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (14 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (12 papers), Hops Chemistry and Applications (8 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (804 citations), Microbiology (27 citations), Cell Biology (567 citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (341 citations). Tom Young has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include D.N. Pegler, J. S. Hough, D. E. Briggs, P. Jeffries, Stephen T. Moss, Simon Ward, Nicholas J. Kuhn, Rebecca Stevens, Mohammad Ilias and Ronald H. Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Institute of Brewing, Mycologia, Annals of Botany, Archives of Microbiology and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.