Tom Sorell
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
- Philosophy 24
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 15
- War, Ethics, and Justification 5
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Co-authors
- Heather Draper (15 shared papers)Jonathan Ives (5 shared papers)Judith Petts (5 shared papers)Jayne Parry (5 shared papers)Sheila Greenfield (5 shared papers)Sue Wilson (5 shared papers)Christine Gratus (3 shared papers)Monica T. Whitty (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ethics and Information Technology (3 papers)BMC Public Health (3 papers)Journal of Medical Ethics (3 papers)The Monist (3 papers)Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong KongAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tom Sorell
75 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Health Informatics 26
- Philosophy 203
- Emergency Medical Services 108
- Safety Research 99
- History and Philosophy of Science 53
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Sorell
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Sorell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Sorell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Sorell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Sorell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Sorell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Sorell. The network helps show where Tom Sorell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Sorell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 197 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 109 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 48 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 21 |
About Tom Sorell
Tom Sorell is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (15 papers), Ethics in medical practice (9 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (26 citations), Philosophy (203 citations), Emergency Medical Services (108 citations), Safety Research (99 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (53 citations). Tom Sorell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Heather Draper, Jonathan Ives, Judith Petts, Jayne Parry, Sheila Greenfield, Sue Wilson, Christine Gratus, Monica T. Whitty, David Boonin and Noel Malcolm. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics and Information Technology, BMC Public Health, Journal of Medical Ethics, The Monist and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.