Sandra Bedaf

12 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Sandra Bedaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Demography 138
  • Social Psychology 210
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Human-Computer Interaction 42
  • Occupational Therapy 30
Replace Mélodie Boulay with:
Mélodie Boulay France
Ahmed Al‐Hindawi United Kingdom
Cory-Ann Smarr United States
Denise Hebesberger Austria
Hannah Bradwell United Kingdom
Hélène Kerhervé France
Hiroko Kamide Japan
Christine Fassert France
Rhona Winnington New Zealand
Anastasia K. Ostrowski United States
Sandra Bedaf relative to Mélodie Boulay France Mélodie Boulay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Mélodie Boulay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Bedaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Bedaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Bedaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Bedaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Bedaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Bedaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Bedaf. The network helps show where Sandra Bedaf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Bedaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Bedaf Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Bedaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2014104
2 201774
3 201655
4 201750
5 201339
6 201312
7
What Should a Robot do for you? - Evaluating the Needs of the Elderly in the UK
201311
8 201810
9 20178
10
What asking potential users about ethical values adds to our understanding of an ethical framework for social robots for older people.
20146
11 20123
12 20202

About Sandra Bedaf

Sandra Bedaf is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Demography, Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions and Occupational Therapy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (7 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (5 papers), AI in Service Interactions (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 paper), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (1 paper) and Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (138 citations), Social Psychology (210 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations) and Occupational Therapy (30 citations). Sandra Bedaf has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Luc de Witte, Gert Jan Gelderblom, Patrizia Marti, Farshid Amirabdollahian, G.J. Gelderblom, Tom Sorell, Heather Draper, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Hagen Lehmann and Dag Sverre Syrdal. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology, Assistive Technology, International Journal of Social Robotics, BMC Public Health and Gerontechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact