Tom L. Smith

184 papers receiving 9.1k citations

Peers

Tom L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Biological Psychiatry 441
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 585
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Epidemiology 2.5k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 896
Replace Eric Otto Johnson with:
Eric Otto Johnson United States
Elliot C. Nelson United States
Howard B. Moss United States
Patrick K. Randall United States
Nathan G. Gillespie United States
Sherry A. McKee United States
Dixie J. Statham Australia
Hildegard Pfister Germany
Hamdi Mbarek United States
Jeesun Jung United States
Tom L. Smith relative to Eric Otto Johnson United States Eric Otto Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Eric Otto Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom L. Smith. The network helps show where Tom L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Tom L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 188 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005428
2 2004334
3 2004317
4 1990281
5 1987241
6 1998229
7 1997224
8 1999219
9 2000216
10 1987196
11 1997175
12 2013174
13 2001159
14 1987139
15 1997135
16 2006123
17 1996122
18 2002121
19 1997121
20 2004119

About Tom L. Smith

Tom L. Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 188 papers that have together received 9.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (86 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (25 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (441 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (585 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Epidemiology (2.5k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (896 citations). Tom L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Marc Alan Schuckit, Marc A. Schuckit, Michael R. Irwin, Jelger A. Kalmijn, Kathleen Keenan Bucholz, JAYSON E. TIPP, George P. Danko, Ryan S. Trim, VICTOR M. HESSELBROCK and J. Christian Gillin. Their work appears in journals such as Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Addiction, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, American Journal of Psychiatry and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact